I know I’ve written something similar before but with my impending job loss and deteriorating mental health I wanted something to kick start a walking routine so that I can at least do what I can to help myself through this period. I returned the series 5 I owned briefly and I’ve gotten the series 2 out of the drawer and got some new thoughts on it.
Contrary to what I said previously I think if you’re after a basic step tracker then the series 2 will be fine. All I’m after is something to make sure I’m working towards 10,000 steps a day.
It’s not working with my iPhone 100% in terms of apps as I’m using iOS 14 and my series 2 can’t run the watchOS beta but for basic step counting and workout tracking it still works fine.
I’ve turned off all notifications and still trying to treat it like my Casio I.e. not obsess over the health data it’s giving me but just think of it as a FitBit.
I’m not even monitoring my activity rings daily, if I hit them ok or if I don’t ok no worries.
If you want to use your watch as a second iPhone to manage apps and notifications the series 2 isn’t for you but for the kind of tracking I’ve described above it’s still great.
I’ve owned this Watch now for over 3 years and it’s still going strong. Minimal wear on the screen and the battery still lasts all day.
I’ve set aside some cash for a new Apple Watch or Android phone this year so I’ll have to see how it goes in terms of keeping using it but I’m tempted to run this series 2 into the ground and see how long I can make it last.
I’ve had a full day with a fully charged Apple Watch Series 5 with the following
Always on display
3 workouts lasting a total of 35 minutes
Occasional check of task list or setting a timer
At the end of the day I’m on 34%, in comparison to my Series 2 where I’d be on about 50%. So we’re looking at 15-20% less with the always on display, which to me doesn’t seem too bad.
I’ll be charging overnight as I don’t go as far as sleep tracking. This means that as long as I end the day with 15-20% I’m good. Obviously haven’t tested a long day out somewhere yet but I’m hopeful it’ll get me through it ok.
I’ve decided to try to take control of my weight and thought I’d dig out my Apple Watch series 2 to give this whole rings things a good go. I’ve owned one since the original but in the last year I’ve all but stopped using it.
When put my series 2 back on a week ago I started to get on a run of walk and ring completion streaks and started to enjoy it but the series 2 was getting slow to use. The workout app was slow to start often missing the beginning of my walk and I’d get lag everywhere in the UI.
I decided to trade my series 2 back to Apple (£60) and use a little work discount to upgrade to the Nike Series 5 in silver. I paired it with my original black sports band, 5 years old and looks as good as new.
I love the black/silver looks and some of the new faces look great.
I’ve been using it for a day and I have to say that moving from a series 2 is a massive jump up. The hardware is more refined, that bigger screen is amazing and the speed improvement is huge. Having worn a mechanical watch or digital for a while I’m also appreciating the always on display. Something I’m still getting used to having and still find I’m raising my wrist like I still have the series 2.
I’m glad I went aluminium too, having briefly owned a stainless steel series 4 the lower weight makes it feel more like a sports watch.
I might write something up on my activity progress but first impressions are great so far.
I wear my Apple Watch quite rarely these days but when I do I’m reminded how slow the series 2 is in 2020. On playing around with settings I’ve discovered a couple of settings that appear to have sped it up a bit.
Reducing transparency and motion seem to have sped up the general UI issues I was experiencing.
I feel like I’ve used the G-SHOCK enough now to get a feel for the differences I’ve experienced compared to using my Apple Watch and wanted to share a few thoughts on using both.
For me the resin bands on any of the Casio models offer really great comfort. I’ve tried all sorts of bands on the Apple Watch but just couldn’t find one to match it. My default remains the sports band and when I wear an Apple Watch I’m on the original black band I had years ago with my original model. Now of course this is personal preference but I find the no fuss resin bands of the Casio more comfortable. One thing I would say though is the G-SHOCK band is thicker than your average Casio so does take a bit more to adjust to.
Easy one here, Casio is £80 and Apple Watch whilst still cheaper for a series 3 is £299. You do get a lot more tech though so hard to compare here. You have to have a good think about what you’re looking to track.
The Casio is nothing more than a step counter, no HR (Heart Rate) sensor but does have an accelerometer so does a great job of tracking how much you’ve moved throughout the day. When you’re walking you don’t set a workout going you simply go, I do set a timer but that’s for me to track my regular walking route. It’s not going to tell you anything other than steps and time. The Apple Watch is much more in-depth and if you’re ok with a lot of data and all day HR checking then the Casio cannot compete in this arena. You do of course get a tonne of battery life on the Casio (2 years) and although I don’t workout this way there are options for setting specific saved timers. I can’t comment on this as I walk for my exercise.
Nothing on the Casio apart from the app and Bluetooth to connect. No notifications or apps built in, it’s a watch with simple step tracking. I like this about it, I forget I’m wearing it and can sync data to the app whenever I want to (although it does it on it’s own a few times a day). Of course you can pair the notifications of the Apple Watch down to nothing also if you want to but I still find I get distracted by anything on the Apple Watch.
Which should you get?
G-SHOCK is a massive watch brand and has a cult following, if you’re into G-SHOCK then this is probably the one to get. I also think it’s a good choice if you want to start to track how active you are and don’t want to put much data into the world about it, like the now Google owned Fitbit.
For me it was about simplifying my setup and tracking less, just seeing if I’d hit 10,000 steps is all I need.
Don’t get me wrong the Apple Watch is a great bit of kit but for me personally it opened up a world of information that I couldn’t track anymore (more on this in a separate post coming soon…). For most people though it’ll be a great choice, especially a series 3, the activity ring system is world class and a great motivator once you get streaks going.
Ultimately though it may come down to price and for £80 you can’t beat the G-SHOCK.
Now I’ve been getting back into traditional watches I feel like I can weigh in a bit here and give my own opinion. Articles like this one seems to delight in the fact that they are losing some sort of smart watch war but they aren’t even in it.
Traditional Swiss watch makers, like Swatch and Tissot, are losing the smartwatch wars. Apple Watch is delivering a better product through deeper retail channels and appealing to younger consumers who increasingly want digital wristwear. The window for Swiss watch brands to make an impact in smartwatches is closing. Time may be running out for Swatch, Tissot, TAG Heuer, and others.
If you’ve even used a traditional watch for more than a few days and appreciate it’s simplicity, design and history then you’ll realise that the smart brands will never be in the smart watch game and stick to their roots.
For me now I’ve gotten to appreciate a more distraction free traditional watch I find I don’t want to go back to wearing an Apple Watch. Yes I can pair down notifications but for me it just looks like a screen on your wrist, the design isn’t actually that great.
Part of the appeal of a traditional watch (for me) is the design and history. The Apple Watch sat in my wrist with just a square screen and nothing on it just looks a bit rubbish.
As someone getting back into watches I tend to have a little look around at what people are wearing and when I see the “younger” crowd I’m seeing either nothing or a Casio, mostly F91w’s. I don’t think I personally know anyone under the age of 40 with an Apple Watch.
I’m not saying it isn’t popular or course but I think this article misses the point. Traditional watch people will stay traditional watch people, appreciating the design and history of a brand or having a sentimental connection to a particular watch they own.
The way I see Apple Watch these days is purely as a fitness tracker that can supplement a traditional watch. I’d love a redesign but that’s a story for another day.